OpenAccess-350-300x300

OpenEdition Academic Committee’s statement on Open Access

Within the framework of the Assises de l’enseignement supérieur et de la recherche, the OpenEdition Academic Committee at the Centre for Open Electronic Publishing wishes to draw the French government’s attention to the issue of Open Access in academic literature.

Open Access benefits all

It is our firm belief that Open Access to academic research results represents a huge progress for society as a whole. Open Access is a highly effective and fair system as it facilitates access to research results for both researchers and lay people the world over. The direct benefits for academic progress, knowledge and society are plain to see. In the humanities and social sciences, comprising a range of disciplines which contribute to our understanding of the complex societies in which we live, Open Access to research results is also essential, for the development of our societies and for the cultural enhancement of all. Open Access also encourages the influence of research beyond national and disciplinary boundaries. Finally, as most research is funded by public money, it is necessary that this collective investment can be made public as quickly and as efficiently as possible.

The Progress of Open Access

The European Union has understood these issues and has undertaken to promote Open Access, which it considers a major asset for continent-wide innovation and, thus, as a lever for improving the efficiency of its investments in the research sector. It supports two approaches: the green road, represented by HAL in France, the system of open archives where researchers deposit their works in full text and make them accessible to all. This solution has enabled thousands of articles in all disciplines to be made available on Open Access. We too support this approach. However, it cannot be the only strategy to be developed.

The second approach is the gold road. Following the Finch report, the United Kingdom has decided to invest massively in this approach. Once, Open Access Gold simply referred to publications – journals and books – published on Open Access. Gradually this definition has altered and now refers to the fast developing “author-pay” business model, where authors, research centres or their financing bodies meet publication costs (varying from $1000-$5000/article). This mechanism has become widespread in certain disciplines, but we do not believe it is the most conducive to the progress of academic knowledge.

  • It ties ability to publish to the financial capabilities of researchers, their laboratories or establishments;
  • The mechanism itself incites publishers to increase the number of publications, whereas, traditionally, their mission and business model was based on choice and the selection of the best articles or books;
  • The editorial ecosystem ultimately depends on a relationship between the author, or financing institution, and the publisher which is too exclusive. The readership and their representatives, especially libraries, who traditionally make selections from a publisher’s range, are marginalised.

We believe in a third road for Open Access. The platinum road creates a form of Open Access publishing that enables authors to publish and readers to read without financial obstacles. The various existing modes to finance such a model are listed in the Open Access Directory. We favour a hybrid model, the Freemium model, where texts are Open Access but a collection of value-added services may be purchased. It is to this end that, in 2011, OpenEdition launched OpenEdition Freemium for journals, and late 2012, launched a Freemium book service (OpenEdition Books). Readers, publishers, and libraries have welcomed the proposal, and initiatives based on the same principle, but with different modus operandi, have also emerged, proof that the idea is catching on. The Freemium model is at the heart of the OpenEdition future investment project selected by the French government for funding for the next eight years to come.

The OpenEdition Academic Committee

Claire Lemercier, Philippe Cibois, Sylvain Piron, Patrice Bellot, Florence Bouillon, Chérifa Boukacem, Marin Dacos, Björn-Olav Dozo, Éric Duchemin, Melanie Dulong de Rosnay, Hubert Guillaud, Pierre-Cyrille Hautcoeur, Jean Kempf, Octavio Kulesz, Joëlle Le Marec, Antónia Lima, Pierre Mercklé, Pierre Mounier, Natalie Petiteau, Jean-Christophe Peyssard, Laurent Romary, Sophie Roux, Hervé Théry, Milad Doueihi, Claudine Moulin.

To find out more

  • The European Commission’s position in 2012 : Towards better access to scientific information:  Boosting the benefits of public investments in research”

 http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/era-communication-towards-better-access-to-scientific-information_en.pdf

  • Finch report: “Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: how to expand access to research publications”

http://www.researchinfonet.org/publish/finch

  • Budapest Open Access Initiative 10 years

 http://www.soros.org/openaccess/boai-10-recommendations

  • List of different Open Access business models listed by the Open Access Directory

http://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/OA_journal_business_models
http://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/OA_book_business_models

  • OpenEdition and OpenEdition Freemium

http://www.openedition.org/6438
http://www.openedition.org/8699

Read this post in French  : http://leo.hypotheses.org/9953


Print This Post Print This Post

Related posts:

  1. The Directory of Open Access Books: a new service of OAPEN in partnership with OpenEdition
  2. OpenEdition and the international structuring of Open Access
  3. Open Access Week: OpenEdition in Torino on October 22
  4. Open Access Week: A week of events promoting open access to research results
  5. German publisher C.H.Beck joins OpenEdition Books for open access publishing

3 thoughts on “OpenEdition Academic Committee’s statement on Open Access

  1. Pingback: Resources on Open Access and the Finch Report | Pierre Purseigle

  2. Pingback: A response to the Finch Report on Open Access | Pierre Purseigle

  3. Pingback: Position du Conseil scientifique d’OpenEdition sur le libre accès | L’Édition électronique ouverte

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> <embed style="" type="" id="" height="" width="" src="" object="" allowfullscreen="" allowscriptaccess="" cachebusting="" bgcolor="" quality="" flashvars=""> <iframe width="" height="" frameborder="" scrolling="" marginheight="" marginwidth="" src=""> <object style="" height="" width="" param="" embed=""> <param name="" value="">